Thursday, December 28, 2023
'73 on the run
Sunday, December 3, 2023
Wisconsin Death Trip
Monday, October 30, 2023
the HALLOWEEN MOVIES ranked, pt. 2: See Anything You Like?
7. Halloween II
Rick Rosenthal manages to swipe the atmosphere of the original and somehow get away with it, albeit it's still obvious that it's on loan. It's as goofy as it is woozy and I used to think that made it boring but now it just effectively puts me in Laurie's headspace as they mine some great tension from her shambling. It's also a nasty, mean little sequel with--at this point in the franchise--uncharacteristically harsh violence. We also have The Shape in a filthy mask and Michael slashing away with bleeding eyes is great imagery. But the characters? The dialog? The contrived brother/sister twist? The lame Samhain lore? The way Rosenthal kicks the whole movie off by woefully undermining the ending of the original? Blegh. There is some unintentional foreshadowing to Looney Loomis with him rushing poor Ben Tramer to his death - makes me laugh every time. It's better than H20 by virtue of its atmosphere and tension but I don't find myself questioning why Carpenter has disowned it as an "abomination." I don't agree but I won't argue, either.
6. 2007
This is almost tied with Halloween II but eeks out on top because Rob Zombie offers better direction than Rick Rosenthal and better characters and dialog than drunk John Carpenter (and most of the other writers of these movies). I appreciate how different his... everything is, even with all the armchair psychology. Well, it's different until it isn't. I like that he took time to humanize Micheal and then strip that humanity away. That said, the prequel section is far more compelling than the Remake section but what holds all of that afloat is his attention to character. Laurie is instantly charming but not in a way that stinks of desperation with quippy one-liners; she's outgoing and playful without being overtly repressed. I'm not a fan of Annie and Linda in the '78 original but here they're played and written with far more interiority; even Lindsay Wallace's Mom is given a sliver of character when Annie refers to her as a "lush who's gonna be out all night getting hammered." The Strodes are so wholesome, riding the line of being cutesy but never dipping into saccharine. The same goes for Tommy and Lindsay, their interactions with Annie and Laurie border on flat-out naturalism. But, yeah, that portion where it's a beat-for-beat remake just does. not. work. So, everything original shines while the mimicry couldn't be more obvious. This was never the movie he was meant to make, it was a Weinstein movie that he managed to give more to than it deserved. What he does next is truly his.
5. 2018
This is a perfectly fine movie though it has its strengths and it has its weaknesses (mostly strengths). There are some baffling choices by David Gordon Green but some are so hilarious that they add to it (Sartain dramatically tossing Michael's mask in the backseat of Hawkins' cruiser) while others are so dumb that they subtract from it (Allison finding her Grandmother's mannequins in the woods, complete with zooms, push-ins, ghostly whispers and creepy laughter[?]). I like the character banter, I love Laurie's public meltdown at dinner, I like Michael killing like a machine, and I love that DGG turned a lot of 'nostalgic' imagery on its head by having Laurie and Michael switch places. And, as much as Sartain is just a plot-device to bring Michael and Laurie together, I still like him as a character; not only does he evoke my favorite Kooky Doctor, ala Part 5, but his 'turn' makes more sense after Ends. This might be the most entertaining, satisfying entry in the franchise with how crowdpleasing the climax is. It's fun and not in an ironic way, for once.
4. Halloween
The original used to be my all-time favorite Horror Movie and then my all-time favorite Slasher and then my all-time favorite Halloween movie but, over the decades, it's wilted for me in every one of those categories. I can't stand Nancy Kyes' acting nor the dialog between her, Laurie, and Linda. It's not just garden-variety bad dialog, it's bad characterization that makes the pacing kind of a slog, with exception to the time we cut to Loomis and Brackett. The last act--while tense--is a bit tedious, too, with Laurie having multiple scenes with Michael where the repetition just annoys more than scares. But it's still effectively chilly, atmospheric, suspenseful, and creepy in spite of all of its glaring flaws. Carpenter, Cundey, Pleasance, Castle, Curtis, and Wallace made magic amidst all the filler. And that ending: one of the best endings to any movie ever, no matter the category.
3. Season Of The Witch
My favorite part of Halloween III is Dr. Daniel Challis: a terminally boozy, slutty amateur detective devoid of charm or charisma that isn't slick. He's like if your Dad decided he wanted to be like James Bond. This dude would rather do anything than spend time with his kids or see his ex-Wife so he flings himself headfirst into a murder mystery (with the explicit desire to fuck his dead patient's daughter).
This isn't a cosmic horror movie, it's a coming-of-middle age comedy akin to The Weather Man or American Beauty - it just so happens to be about child-killing Irish doomsday cultists. Everyone talks about how bleak the ending is and why (for good reason, because it's apocalyptic and cruel) but it's kind of funny, too, in its irony: Challis ignores his kids to investigate this murder and ends up fruitless in his effort to stop the mass genocide of children. If he'd never gone and investigated this in the first place, he probably could have saved his children's lives or, at the very least, spent the smallest amount of time with them before they perished. Everything to do with this case reminds him of his kids and he hates it. It's not a coincidence that the most horrific scene in the movie is him being forced to watch a whole domestic family (Mother, Father, Child) be killed in a simulation of a living room. And at the end he has to kill the woman he's been fucking who's now just a robot serving limited functions. There's also that great scene where he and Ellie sneak by the scientists by walking a cart beside them: a Scooby-Doo maneuver in a scene of tension; All these years this movie never totally worked for me because I was looking for scares. Watching it now, laughing my ass off, it makes for one Hell of a dark comedy.
2. Ends
I always wondered why David Gordon Green and his writers had Corey kinda break the 4th Wall in that shot with Jeremy's parents to say "It's Halloween...we're gonna have a good time tonight." I get it now: in these movies anytime someone says "it's Halloween--" it's usually followed up with "--everyone's entitled to one good scare," so it's almost like Green is telling us to curb expectations. And I'm not pinning a medal on it simply for doing something different, because I genuinely love this movie for many reasons, but a big part of its appeal is how fresh it feels. If Halloween Kills was messy and destructive, then this was a thoughtful rebuild; a somber character study of Michael Myers' protege? That's cool as fuck and they nail the landing. The title, 'HALLOWEEN ENDS,' has already been rendered futile by Miramax announcing another reboot [less than a year after this movie's release] but it's still a satisfying conclusion for me, one that raised the bar significantly.
1. H2 (Director's Cut)
In 2009, before we got a decade+ of artsy horror movies about Trauma, Rob Zombie gave us the best one with his cut of Halloween II. It's the most immersive, textured, effusive, gruelling, brutal, and intoxicating entry in the franchise - featuring a hulking, "pants-shittingly scary" Michael Myers and Laurie Strode at her most Laura Palmer (it's no wonder the cult of fans who adore this movie call it Halloween: Fire Walk With Me).
What happens to a Final Girl after she survives-the-night? Instead of the stale stalk-and-slash that this franchise is known for, Zombie opts for a spiraling nightmare odyssey of PTSD. Scout Taylor-Compton's performance is harrowing and miserable, diving headfirst into waters Jamie Lee Curtis' Lauries only waded waist-deep. It's also an absolute banquet of visual sustenance with richly tactile grime, splashes of color, and harsh spotlights with piercing rays - all shot on film. What I love most about Rob Zombie's whole approach to horror is how he understands pain, both physical and emotional. When characters get hurt in his movies: they hurt. He lingers on pain and dying not in a sadistic way but because his characters are all absolutely real to him, so he treats their pain as such; Annie's death is agonizing because of how shocking it feels, how obscured it is, and because of Brad Dourif's Oscar-worthy reaction to it. Because of every bit of this and more, I fucking adore this movie, even if it's a hard watch to sit through - which is why I only watch it once a year.
Sunday, October 15, 2023
Keeping things under wraps
Thursday, October 12, 2023
A SpookShow guide
Sunday, October 8, 2023
the HALLOWEEN MOVIES ranked, pt. 1: Dangertainment
#13. Curse
Along the broad spectrum of Halloween Franchise variety, Part 6 is tasteless cardboard that's devoid of nutrients. It's tension-free, suspense-free, character-free, gluten-free, low sodium, no carb, low fat, no fun, no sugar, processed Michael Myers food product. The score, the jumpscares, the editing, dialog, ugh...it's all so obnoxious and annoying. Donald Pleasance's presence is the only thing I like. That's how bad it is: Loomis just existing on screen is a comfort. He shows up to walk around what is essentially a Spirit Halloween store with the most cunty staff imaginable. Everyone in it is either paper-thin and forgettable or deeply unlikable - none of them remotely compelling (our Final Girl is WOMAN. Her son is CHILD).
Paul Rudd is always welcome but he's just bad here - not funny-bad, either. Having Tommy Doyle be a shifty little creep is good on paper but turning him into an exposition machine for celtic mythology is fucking YAWN. There have been some awful origin stories/explanations for horror movie villains (like Leatherface's dumb skin disease in TCM '03) but Cult Of Thorn is quite the abortion of mystique.
I hate this movie.
#12. Resurrection
You know it's bad, I know it's bad, I don't need to unpack why for the 297463rd time. So I'm gonna use this slot to defend one major component that gets too much shit: Busta Rhymes' Freddie, with all his one-liners and goofy martial arts, is the only person doing anything remotely fun here.
Seriously, take him out and you still have an awful movie, which means it can't all be on him (the opening is easily the worst part and Freddie hasn't even clocked in yet). I'd even argue that if you take him out, you'd have a much worse movie (final girl is nobody, 'contestants' are despicable, and Decker is beyond lame). And, c'mon, Freddie having a one-sided argument with Michael, while he's dressed as Michael, is a genuinely funny bit; it's the Spider-Man pointing meme but with Micheal Myerses. I don't ever watch this movie, because I hate it, but I revisited it for this ranking and I lit up every time he was on screen; his description of Michael as "a killer shark in baggy-ass overalls" is poetry.
As a character in a movie full of god-awful characters, he's the best of the worst.
"Trick or treat, muthafucka!"
#11. Revenge
The only reason Part 5 is above Resurrection and Part 6 is because of Dr. Sam "Loonie" Loomis. He is so hilariously unhinged and I love it (I also seriously respect Pleasance for committing to the bit for a fourth time; what a camp champ). ...but it's not all fun.
There's also Tina, her friends, those circus clown cops, one of big Mike's worst masks, and deficient filmmaking weighing it down. What it severely lacks in atmosphere, scares, good writing, competent editing, performances, sensible direction, or any spookiness whatsoever, is kinda made up for with Loomis' antics. Him knocking kids' masks off, playing "catch" with Jamie as the ball, holding cops at gunpoint, and of course, "Cookie Woman" (which has stuck with me for decades), is all candy to me.
For most people they love The Room or Troll 2 but Halloween 5 has always been my go-to So Bad It's Good movie. Donald Pleasance hobbled in Halloween 5 so Nic Cage could run in Wicker Man. I enjoy this movie too much to put it any lower.
#10. Return
Part 4 has its moments and the good ones are carried by some pretty effective atmosphere (but we're still far from Carpenter and Cundey 😢). The absolute best part is right up top: this movie has my favorite opening credits sequence in the franchise. There's no typical Halloween Theme, either. All it is is just a skittering, chilly, gusty ambient drone over the most autumnal October imagery this side of Trick 'r Treat and Tim Burton's Sleepy Hollow. I'll throw it on every October but only for the novelty of that picturesque opening and the overall Spooky Szn mood that reverberates from it. It's more of a moving October advent calendar than a movie to me.
And I'm focusing on all of this because everything else is flatlined: Jamie, Rachel, Grady, Meeker, his Daughter - they're nothing characters with the most benign YA novel dialog. Loomis' scenes are kinda nice, he hasn't completely lost it yet. I like him having a swig and a smile with that kooky priest, it's one of the few times in this franchise where we get to see straight-laced joy on the man's face. I don't know, I don't feel strongly either way. It's north of awful but south of good. It's not funny-bad like 5 nor as offensive as 6 because, after everyone rejected Part III, they played it safe and pandered.
Some feelings I can muster up: I don't like Myers' mask in this one, it looks goofy, they should have kept the bandaged-up look from the gas station sequence, it's the only time he's remotely creepy. I don't like how the actor plays him, either, he's wooden as fuck. The ending would be cool if 5 didn't squander it. The lynchmob murder of Ted Hollister is amusing but nowhere near as funny as Ben Tramer's death in Part II.
That's all I got.
#9. Kills
Whereas Part 6 was pathologically thin, KILLS is carelessly gluttonous. It's just a delicious, disgusting, unhealthy, intoxicating, nauseating, annoying, hilarious fucking mess. Anytime I watch it I come away feeling so dizzy and tired, just like I do after I leave a buffet. It wins out over 4 simply because there are pockets where great side characters are given some sincerely memorable, funny banter and then die in some of the coldest ways across every timeline in this convoluted franchise.
Seriously, I'd watch a whole Altman-esque hangout movie featuring all the victims in Michael's path (it makes me want to do a whole post ranking the side characters of the DGG Trilogy). I always get invested in the lives of Sondra and her husband, Big John & Little John, and the shitty kids in the Silver Shamrock masks. They're given charming and relatable little details, like the way Sondra's husband gripes about her Mom smoking in his sleep apnea mask, it imbues them with so much interiority and history.
And the same applies to all the other characters who aren't in the Evil Dies Tonight lynchmob (any complaints I have about that shit has already been said ad nauseum so I'm not gonna bore you; none of it works). Get rid of all the mob violence and shit, get rid of Laurie and Hawkins' sedating monologues, just let us luxuriate with the characters who stayed home...until Michael brutally takes them from us. Cameron's death is downright barbaric and Sondra's husband's death, as she watches helplessly, is unnecessarily tragic and cruelly prolonged. The firefighter sequence, on the other hand, is so fucking fun - The Shape has never been cooler.
I love the way it's shot, too, with that great POV of Michael stabbing through the gas mask. Another great POV shot is employed later, in one of the franchise's worst sequences (Tarvoli's death) - I despise the writing of that scene but it's so visually exciting, which describes a lot of this movie. Michael slaughtering the mob looks great but Laurie's speculative voiceover about evil, or whatever, just dampens it. Not all of Green's choices pay off, though: there are some nonsensical zooms and that neck-snapping whip-pan to Allyson shouting "WHAT?!" almost reaches Part 5 levels of camp. The sequence where Marion Chambers and the Doctor/Nurse couple die does bring us to full-on camp. But the sequence with Lindsay is legitimately tense? Carpenter's score is fucking amazing, though, but nothing in this movie ever earns it. And the worst sin of the movie is that, aside from Laurie coming to the realization that Michael is mostly indifferent to her (that remains unexplored), our main characters are lateral and redundant. They walk and talk in circles, saying the same shit over and over.
This movie has everything, for better and worse.
Mostly worse.
#8. H2O
H20 came on the heels of Part 6 and was followed by Resurrection, so it's wedged between the series' worst movies. It has the best act to follow and after easily dropping the mic, the next act to pick it up fucking bombs. It's also refreshing, for this list, to have a movie so uncomplicated on the tail of KILLS. It has occasional atmosphere (not enough) because the photography is kinda flat and the score is equally inconsistent; the opening theme is interpolated with an orchestra and it's surprisingly effective. But...sometimes it's downright shrill and derivative? There are patches where they recycle tracks from Scream and it undercuts the tension.
I like Laurie's new look and life, she's living with PTSD (even though Halloween [2018] does it better) but seems well-adjusted outside of the holiday. Curtis is typically great and the rest of the cast is good to fine (Hartnett, LL Cool J, and Arkin bring more to their characters than what they were given [I hope Ronnie's novel gets published]). The horny teens aren't annoying enough nor charming enough for me to be affected by their deaths one way or another; they die, that's it (the light-bulb decoration kill is neat). The scariest but in the movie is where just the threat of violence is suggested: the rest-stop bathroom scene, with the Mom and her daughter, is very effective. Unfortunately, it happens very early on and I never get close to that feeling again. It's a pretty middling slasher until the ending; the ending is the best! Laurie pulls a Loomis! She takes a cop's gun, orders a paramedic to load Michael's body in the van, drives said van into Michael (after launching him out the windshield) and they both topple off a hillside.
Finally, she decapitates him with an ax and it's extremely satisfying (fuck the retcon: that's Michael's noggin. Her huge sigh of relief will not be undercut). It's a serviceable movie besides HOLY SHIT THAT CGI MASK WHAT THE FUCK!?
Friday, October 6, 2023
Dr. Satan's Lair
Sunday, September 24, 2023
American HERstory X
I've watched about 15 or 20 movies since then but not a day has gone by where I haven't thought about this movie. And I haven't just had passing thoughts: I've dwelled on it and been distracted by it during other movies, having to snap myself out of the trance. So I watched it two more times.
This is a tremendous movie but part of its power comes from how deliberately suffocating it is. One critic correctly referred to it as "queasy," which...yeah, it's uncomfortable, that's the point. I appreciate how uneasy this movie is to swallow. In the tradition of someone like William Friedkin, director Beth de Araújo goes for it in terms of eventual violence and it's neither tasteless nor tasteful because this isn't a trashy Lifetime movie nor some palatable White Guilt movie - you either have the stomach for it, or you don't. The first time I watched it I certainly didn't and so I couldn't accurately gauge its pacing because the last 40•ish minutes I had to pause it and take breaks. There are frequent racial slurs, antisemitism, infuriating philosophizing, chilling cruelty, sexual assault, emotional and physical torture, and murder to contend with.
Soft & Quiet was picked up by Blumhouse, the biggest name in theatrical horror distribution, but it quietly dumped S&Q onto VOD, which stinks of corporate cowardice. I get that it's not easily marketable but TikTok word-of-mouth has done the marketing anyway. Again, I'm reminded of Friedkin, specifically how Disney, via Criterion, took the N-word out of The French Connection, which is more racist (and dangerous) than the actual use of the N-word. What they essentially did was more of the same shit that Ron DeSantis and other Anti-CRT chuds have been doing: sanitizing history. French Connection isn't a racist movie, it's a movie about a racist, but Disney committed a cover-up, absolving him by tampering with the evidence - which is the kind of shit that a racist cop would do. Blumhouse should have made more noise for this movie, especially since it's so fucking well-made (and a debut feature no less!!).
Not only was it filmed in four takes over four days, but each time they had to painstakingly plan out every shot, lighting change, and blocking while never losing momentum or sunlight. We follow them over three car rides and a boat trip all while the cinematographer, Greta Zozula, is lugging the camera on her shoulder and having to keep things visually fresh while racing the setting sun. There's this gorgeous shot late in the movie where a character stands in front of a window and the colors of the dusky cobalt blue sunset gradient in the background, with the interior orange light in the foreground, is incredibly striking. They either planned for that and executed it perfectly or they took advantage of it on the fly - either way it's remarkable. Shortly after there's a shot where two characters are engulfed by brake lights, so it's just this frightening blood-red flood in the frame.
I have written so much about how gimmicky and lame long takes are now but S&Q does it 1) for the sake of propulsive kinetic energy 2) without any noticeable digital stitching so 3) everything that unfolds is as naked and tense as possible. It serves a narrative and sensory purpose, it's not a masturbatory exercise in style. The home invasion and all the messy violence that spurts out is inescapable because it's never obscured by time-jumps or cushy surrealism via dream logic. The dialog drives everything in real-time and is so expertly woven in.
As everything falls apart and escalates, the way these characters talk to each other is nonstop development as resentments and interpersonal dynamics open like blisters and some oozing surprises dribble out. The breathless endurance of the performances is exhausting and engrossing, especially Olivia Luccardi's character Lesley (who echoes Fairuza Balk's character from American History X). She's a wildcard of cruelty, opportunism, and cunning manipulation who escalates everything until everyone is hysterically turning on each other (more on her later). Watching the chaos of in-fighting and sloppy ineptitude isn't funny by any means (comedy as a genre might as well be on the moon in this case) but there's a thick air of self-destructive pitifulness; these women aren't just hateful but pathetic and desperate, which makes them scarier. The real-time aspect isn't just about watching them commit their acts of barbarity but showing the cover-up mines a lot of tension too. Not just because, for them, it's the suspense of worrying they're not gonna get away with it. But, for us, it's hopelessly sickening watching them cover their tracks. It's almost like getting a glimpse into the potential night of Tamla Horsford's death, which isn't deliberate at all but it was on my mind for most of the final act.
The racist banter between these pie-baking wine-Mom Karens and yoga pants-clad Beckies strikes a perfect balance: It could easily be laid on too thick or downplayed to make them 'sympathetic,' but it's never didactic or sanitized. Even with that meticulous care for her script (built by extensive research, cultural osmosis, and traumatic life experience) people refuse to give de Araújo her flowers or, hell, her agency. I'll chalk it up to them being uninformed.
Most critiques of Soft & Quiet are dismissive and uncharitable: "Why was this made?" and/or "we don't need this, especially for people of color," over and over those sentiments kept popping up.
I'm gonna field the question as if it's not rhetorical, "Why was this made?" well, writer/Director Beth de Araújo said this scenario is her worst nightmare - thankfully she lived it through her art rather than in real life. Saying it offers nothing to people of color is nearsighted considering she's a woman of color (Chinese and Brazilian) who, in the wake of asian people being viciously attacked on the street, needed a creative outlet. The director herself is saying "this shit scares me" but her immersive art therapy is rejected as 'unnecessary'?
Let's put Soft & Quiet up against the polar opposite: Victor Salva, a director convicted for molesting young boys, made Jeepers Creepers 2, a horror movie about young boys who are left helpless at the mercy of a flying, unstoppable monster known as The Creeper. Said Creeper picks off all of the adults and then takes its time choosing young boys to victimize. It couldn't be more sickeningly obvious that this is wish-fulfillment. So we have two horror movies where one is made by someone terrified of her nightmares coming true and the other is made by someone whose wet dreams are nightmarish. And I make that juxtaposition because it's important to unpack authorship; the art is so integral to the specific artist making it. Ever since #MeToo the debate of 'separating the art from the artist' has been exhaustively unpacked but after reading reviews for Soft & Quiet a question no one has asked manifested: does that apply to victims' art as well...?
Look back a few years: The Handmaid's Tale, The Invisible Man, The Assistant, and Don't Worry Darling, all stories where white women have been centered when it comes to media about power dynamics and abuse. Don't Worry Darling is the bottom of the barrel for many reasons but mainly because its only woman of color is reduced to a plot device and sacrificial negro to propel our white heroine. It's a thankless role but it's just par for the course with White Feminist myopia. Handmaid's Tale is no better: it's hailed as this great Dystopian Feminist show but it just shows white women being treated like black women were during slavery. In fact, the white women are treated worse than the black women on the show, so it truly is science fiction. It's the closest they could get to roleplaying misogynoir without wearing actual Blackface.
I remember after the very first Women's March in 2017 there were scores of women of color talking about their experiences, about how they didn't feel included, that sentiments about Black Lives Matter or Human Rights Violations at the border were treated with contempt, among others. And the backlash was white women eschewing apologies in favor of saying "we don't need to talk about that," cuz they would rather One Size Fits All than unpack the uncomfortable intricacies of intersectionality. Same thing happened when Roe v. Wade was overturned: women of color wanted to talk about how they had much more difficult times getting the services they needed for abortions, but White Women shot them down with the same condescending "we're all in this together" bullshit. Their tone had the insulting "time-and-place" snark even though the time and place is a continuum.
I remember back during the George Floyd protests in 2020 there was a growing sentiment bolstered by CNN that "if we're going to reform police, we need to hire more women." It's a level of out-of-touch delusion that's downright staggering. Consider Officer Amber Guyger's home invasion and execution of Botham Jean. Not to mention Officer Lacy Browning responding to a mental wellness check leading to her pressing her foot into Mona Wang's neck, pulling her hair, and dragging her across the floor face-down. There are also the Karens who wield the police as their own personal attack dogs to intimidate people of color (or worse) for barbequing, bird-watching, dog-walking, or just... existing.
Representation is important and that goes for monsters, too, especially since, for some, portraying something cinematically is more legitimizing than what's on the news or social media.
Thankfully, Jordan Peele did that with Get Out, and it was specifically 102 years in the making.
D.W. Griffith's Ku Klux Klan propaganda film, BIRTH OF A NATION, shows a white damsel running from a monstrous black man (played by a white man in blackface) intent to harm her - the Klan show up and 'heroically' save her from this 'Black Devil.' That was 1915 and it kicked off a CENTURY of harmful imagery portraying black men as lustful, violent, white-women-obsessed animals. 102 years later, Get Out finally shows a black man's hands on a white woman's throat and it's not only 100% justified but it's a satisfying, stand-up-and-cheer moment.
Curiously, though: Chris stops. He looks scared... because this lady is SMILING.
As it starts to dawn on Rose that she's gonna die, she fucking smiles at Chris and it's an EVIL fucking grin. It's not explicitly spelled out _why_ she smiles but it can be interpreted so many ways. My guess is, from her warped, racist perspective, she's reveling in watching 'his true nature' come out. She's willing to die, out of spite, to 'prove' he's just like the Black Devil from Birth Of A Nation. OR she's imagining Chris going down for her 'murder' because she knows the courts won't believe his fantastical story about racial brain-swapping. Rose knows the marks on her neck will tell the story for her, regardless of the truth - even from the grave she can control the power dynamic. But soon after this, Peele plays with expectations and perspective when we see red and blue police lights. Usually this would mean rescue... in a white horror movie. Chris is logically terrified while Rose typically reaches out for help; she knows a cop will fall for her angelic sham. It's a great moment of tension because Peele makes Chris, and us, sit for an agonizing few seconds because he knows we're thinking about what the cops THINK they saw: a black man on top of a white woman with his hands on her neck - with no context whatsoever. Thankfully, this is a fake-out: it's Rod and he doesn't question Chris' actions once because he's not just Chris' friend, he knows exactly what he saw: self-defense. So in the case of Soft & Quiet, de Araújo centers white women for the very first time not as victims but as monsters, to challenge other media that never questioned white women's complicity in racism and the patriarchy. It's a whole eat•pray•love Book Club of Roses.
Female White Supremacists are usually balanced out by white female allies (for every racist Bryce Dallas Howard in The Help, there's an Emma Stone to the rescue, her saintly actions silently saying Not All White Women). There's one woman who initially dissents but the other women gently harp on her racial biases and nurture them, after some alcohol and comfort in solidarity it's not long before she hurtles toward full-on hatred.
There are few male characters but they're included in really subversive ways. The most innocent one being a little boy, no older than 10. He's alone, waiting for his Mom to pick him up from school. Emily, his teacher and the movie's ringleader, is shown early on in despair that she can't have kids, so she takes advantage of the fact that he's alone and lightly grooms him. She instructs him to publicly insult a Latina custodian, shows him a swastika in a pie she's been holding, and tells him about a children's book she's writing (we never see what's in the book but it's not hard to imagine). It's stomach-churning shit.
There's another moment where the Ladies' first meeting is cut short by a Preacher at the church they've gathered at. He'd heard some of their hateful dreck and doesn't mince words about kicking them out. Emily initially balks in defiance so he deepens his tone and pushes back - she begrudgingly gives in. He made her feel powerless and, coming off the dopamine rushes of grooming her student and indoctrinating the more sheepish woman in her meeting, she hones in on her next target: her husband.
This is where Emily's character really comes to life, in the worst ways. They're all gearing up to commit a hate crime but he tries to sober them up. And I'm not gonna give him too much credit: he's hesitant purely for the sake of self-preservation. He's just as much a bigot as they are but his vision isn't as clouded as theirs in this moment so he tries to tell them what obvious repercussions are on the horizon. Emily is insulted and disgusted, because he's not willing to participate that somehow makes him "weak". So she uses toxic masculinity to bend him to her will; venomously emasculating him, calling him a "Faggot," and the other women join in with utterances of "man up." He gives in and helps them but he never loses that foresight, even with simmering resentment and panic practically glowing under his skin. The most telling moment is, after they've gotten to the house, they're hiding because their victims come home early. He starts to panic and berate her so Emily viciously slaps him and even denies him his need to cry. Almost like a jumpscare he starts to slap himself over and over, taking out the anger he feels toward her on himself, it's not just startling in the moment but we can glean so much of their history from these few scenes.
Like, maybe she projects onto him her inability to get pregnant and so it manifests into outright abuse, nitpicking any sign of weakness as confirmation bias, and using that to cut him down and mold him. He's certainly susceptible if the right buttons are pushed but he's also not stupid so he fucks off from the narrative altogether. Emily is left to fend for herself and Lesley is the one to take advantage and extort her. From then on Emily does everything that Lesley barks at her and is brought back to the despair from earlier.
So much is said on the whole about indoctrination, power dynamics, racism, toxic masculinity, gender politics, and entitlement. Unlike most one-dimensional racist characters who are usually deprived of characterization through subtractive cliches and stereotypes, our hateful leads are layered and compelling without being sympathetic. Not once does it ever half-heartedly preach about racism nor absolve its racists by having them learn some contrived lesson(s). It also doesn't give us any immediate satisfaction in seeing them punished, either. One of the top reviews on Letterboxd complains that we never see them die after all that they've done; Inglourious Basterds this is not.
Comeuppance and redemption arcs are both barred at the door because racism isn't solved easily.
So, do we "need this"? Well, I can't speak to what anyone else needs but I'll say that, as a culture, we've never been shown a movie like this. So I'll ask: If we don't need this, what's the alternative? Most media that 'challenges' Neo Nazis are usually pretty fucking toothless (Jojo Rabbit) vehicles for self-congratulations. Soft & Quiet has teeth but self-righteous neoliberals don't like being confronted with ideology that makes them uncomfortable. Instead, they opt for being spoonfed reassurances that they're good people and mock individuals rather than understand them, especially when confronted with a mirror like this that isn't designed for virtue signaling sentiment, rather the notion that they're the real villains deep down.
I hate Misery Porn just as much as the next person but this is a tour of an artist's anxieties, a cinematic coping mechanism, not tragedy-as-cheap-spectacle. If you don't like it based on technical aspects or if it makes you uncomfortable---for whatever reasons---fine, critique it, but don't call into question its 'merit' for existing. If a filmmaker uses their art to heal, more power to them, and [SPOILERS] based on the ending I'm confident that She needed this.
"In order to empathize with someone’s experience you must be willing to believe them as they see it and not how you imagine their experience to be." – Brené Brown