Citizen Kane. The film to end all films. The greatest film
ever made. Number one in…well, everything. Probably the worst thing to happen
to Kane was for it to end up number 1 on the AFI Top 100 Films. There is just no way it can possibly live up to someones expectations with that kind of reputation. Ever since
then, it has divided people into two camps. On one hand, you have the
cinephiles who revere it and feel it necessary, no mandatory, to have it as
part of one’s own top 100. Anyone who doesn’t is obviously lacking cinematic
knowledge. There are varying degrees of this type of attitude that spill over
to countless movie blogs where cinephiles proclaim their love to the next
obscure foreign film while shitting on a genre movie of lower stature or
disguising their love for a movie like Under Seige by adding the title ‘Guilty
Pleasure’ to it. The horror and exploitation genre of the 70’s probably go
under the microscope the most. It’s this type of cinephile elitism that tends
to get under my skin.
On the other hand, you have the genre fans. Or the people
who show adoration to Texas Chainsaw Massacre 2, 21 Jump Street or Halloween:
Season of the Witch without shame. And there’s nothing wrong with liking a
genre picture with lower critical stature. While the passion is just as authentic as
loving Chinatown or GoodFellas, there is something else going on that,
ideologically speaking, is shared with the other camp- looking down on a movie for
bizarre and nonsensical reasons. This brings us back to Citizen Kane. It’s
become almost cool to knock the movie. Does anyone really like it? I mean
really? Well, the answer to that question is a resounding yes. And if you think
it’s not, you can get in contact with William Friedkin, Peter Bogdonavich,
Spielberg, Scorsese and countless other directors and tell them they are faking
it.
Still not good enough to sway your argument? Well let’s put
it this way. When discussing any piece of art, one has to look at not just
subjectivity but objectivity. Take Pulp Fiction for example. Does anyone really
like that film? Or do they just say that because it is the beneficiary of
cultural hypnosis? You can also make the same case for Raging Bull, Vertigo,
City Lights, The Godfather, Casablanca, or any major movie that has received
lots of critical acclaim over the years. All of these movies have contributed
to the growth of cinema. Like it or not. It’s not that Kane is just considered
greatest film of all time because of film elitism or cultural relevancy. It
took all of what was aesthetically possible back in 1941 and added a few new
tricks to the trade of the cinematic art form. The same way how a video store
clerk wrote a script that changed the structure and the way people talk in
movies. Or how a man, whose debut film was a B- horror movie, decided to adapt
a book by Mario Puzo. These were major risk takers. Something that is in short
supply in today’s industry.
The AFI lists are flawed. I get it. It still
doesn’t discount the impact those individual movies have had on cinema. Film is
an art form. Above all, it is a medium where one day you can watch Sunset
Boulevard one day and follow it up with Bill and Ted’s Excellent Adventure.
Both can be enjoyed by the same person. There
is no 40, 50, 60 or 70 year rule for an acknowledged masterpiece. Films like
Citizen Kane are without an expiration date.
No comments:
Post a Comment